           |
| PARAGLIDING
IN
SA | FLYING
SITES | REVIEWS
| AIRLORE |
STORIES
| GALLERY |
CARTOONS |
INDEPENDENCE DRAGON 2
by Darron Guberman
Darron is a natural pilot with acro tendencies. He has been flying
since 2000. Read
his profile.
You might also like to read:
Other paraglider reviews
on this website.
|
|
|
| Don't
miss out! Get the next paraglider test as soon as it's released, by JOINING OUR MAILING LIST. |
If
you don’t go to the Stubai Cup in Austria every year, it’s easy to miss
new entrants in the paragliding scene. Independence is one
such
company, already with a slew of gliders that slipped under my radar
screen.
INTRODUCTION
German based Independence has been making gliders since 2001.
Their designer, Michael Nesler, made wings for Perche, Edel and other
manufactures before going on his own.
The Independence brand includes 7 wings ranging from DHV1 to
competition. They make a tandem glider and have a specially
tuned
wing for aerobatics (which is based on the Dragon2).
The original Dragon was improved to reduce fabric wrinkles, increase
stability at speed and remain the “best price-quality-performance
ratio” on the market. I decided to verify the hype with 5
test
flights around Cape Town.
CONSTRUCTION
The Dragon2 is made from Porcher Marine Skytech rip-stop fabric on both
upper and lower surfaces. The lines are covered, colour coded
and
made from Edelrid HMA aramid.
All four sizes have 46 cells. A few on each end are closed
with
the rest wide open. Risers are the standard black webbing
with
colour markings on the inner A’s and C’s (yellow and blue,
respectively). The glider is equipped with Brummel hook
connections for the speed system.
All of the wings come with a grey underside leading edge, followed by a
black stripe stretching from tip to tip. The upper surface
and
trailing edge half of the lower surface is available in four colors:
red, orange, blue and gold. Extra colors are available by
special
request.
The brake toggles are adequate flat webbing with a stiffener and a
magnetic keeper.
The backpack is large enough to accommodate the average to extra-cushy
harnesses out there. Medium density foam is stitched into the
back of the pack to provide better ventilation while hiking.
When
the shoulder straps stay in place the pack carries rather well, but I
found the straps kept slipping.
My demo wing arrived in a very nice stuff sack with shoulder
straps. Unfortunately, that is an extra accessory.
Overall the wing looks well made and solid. A look at the
www.independence-world.com website will answer most any question about
how the wing is constructed, except for what materials are
used.
After learning about the 1 year or 300 hour (whichever comes first)
warranty I closed the computer and went flying.
LAUNCHING
The Dragon2’s fully open leading edge inflates to a wall easily with a
light breeze or more. In light winds the launch requires the
use
of both split A’s and an average pull. In strong winds the
center
A’s work fine. In really strong winds (the kind you shouldn’t
be
flying in) the glider bounces on the trailing edge as it gulps in air.
The Dragon2 is forgiving on launch. Inflation and pull-ups
were
all hassle-free. On one launch where I stumbled, I was surprised to see
the wing patiently waiting overhead for me charge down the ramp.
The brake toggles get bumped off their magnets easily while turning
around, but a proper preflight should find them securely in your hands
before launching.
HANDLING
The air was cold; the cliff was sheer and the wind light south
east. It’s winter and thermals swirl only in my
memories.
But when on a mission to test a new glider, any huge cliff with a cable
car will do. Several hundred meters of air is just what I
wanted
– even if only for a foofy.
To my delight the Dragon2 carried me above the cold, shadowed cliff
face in a mild breeze. High above the ground I let go of the
toggles and threw my weight from side to side. Round and
round in
figure eights I went with no hands. The weight shift was
good. I was even starting to warm up!
Adding some properly timed brake input turned the eights into
coordinated wing-overs. The brake pressure and travel length
didn’t even cross my mind. I normally notice if the travel is
too
long or the pressure too high. But I was throwing the wing
around
within a few minutes without even thinking about it. The
brake
pressure and turning increase so naturally that one hardly notices that
you have to steer. Or maybe my hands just got numb!
In normal flying, and I suspect thermalling, the Dragon turns better
than average for its class. It was only on subsequent flights
when I tried to go upside down that I noticed the damping effects of a
DHV1-2 wing.
Unfortunately, my flights were all lacking in thermals. The
only
bumps I felt were blown in by the southeaster. The
ever-so-mild
turbulence I encountered jostled my harness more than the
wing. A
less stable wing may have lost a tip in the air I flew threw, but in
winter all gliders seem pretty solid.
SAFETY
The Dragon2, with its DHV 1-2 rating shouldn’t have ugly surprises for
low airtime pilots. With the several hundred meters of air
below,
I started looking for surprises in each maneuver.
Big ears are easy to pull although the outside A riser is black just
like the B riser. The ears have a major tendency to stick
in. So don’t think you can use and then remove them quickly
to
get your final glide just right. Opening the tips required a
lot
of pumping the brakes.
Asymmetric collapses were mellow, didn’t result in much of a turn and
fixed themselves much better than big ears. Collapses on full
speed bar were in line with other gliders of this class.
Symmetric frontal collapses recover automatically with a slight
delay. Thereafter the wing surges forward and resumes normal
flight. The pull required to fold the leading edge felt good
and
not too easy.
Wing-overs are well coordinated and fun. Brake travel,
pressure
and authority are just right to make carving through the sky a
delight. Newer pilots up to experienced recreational pilots
will
feel at ease with the speed of turning on the Dragon. More
expert
and certainly acro pilots will feel hindered by the wing’s roll rate.
Spiral dives are easy to enter with just a little more weight shift and
brake than one would use for tight thermalling. The
transition
from mild spiral to locked-in spiral occurs with a normal “bite” as the
g’s pick up.
B-line stalls are more difficult to do with the Dragon2 than other
wings I have flown. The B-riser is black like the rest of the
webbing, so finding the correct riser requires a little
searching. It’s where it should be, but you need to look
carefully to make sure you grab the correct one. A slightly
more
forceful pull is required to crease the wing, and maintaining that
shape will work your arms out.
Full stalling the wing requires average determination. The
brake
pressure increases steadily and sufficiently to keep the vast majority
of pilots from stalling accidentally. The signs of an
unhappy,
bending backwards wing are all there before the Dragon2 actually stops
flying. Recovery is like most gliders, but with a little more
surge than I expected. You’ll know you’re flying again when
the
glider dives 45 degrees in front of you.
Negative spins also have all the warning signs a newer pilot needs to
keep out of trouble. Long, deliberate pulling warps the
glider
back before it actually spins. Once spinning, the wing stays
pretty much fully open and rotates at a normal speed. The
Dragon’s one ugly surprise was in the spin recovery. I only
spun
the Dragon2 once (that was enough, thanks) and when I released the
brake it shot forward. The tip I had not stalled darted in
front
of me and below the horizon. The wing tip went slack and blew
past me as I fell under the wing. This was rather unexpected
for
a wing of this class and certainly got my attention!
PERFORMANCE
The Dragon2 has a speed range typical of a modern intermediate
wing. Trim when I tested it was around 34 km/h and top speed
was
about 47 km/h. The manufacturer claims faster speeds which
are
likely only if clipped in very heavy. The accelerator system
is
short enough that it is easy to use 100% of it.
Energy retention when exiting a spiral is average. The glide
ratio is not specified by Independence, but it felt typical of the
newer wings of this class.
CONCLUSION
Independence has succeeded in making a very fun to fly, polished glider
that many pilots will enjoy. The Dragon2 is well behaved in
most
areas, with pitch being the only exception.
The Dragon2 is suitable for a wide range of pilots from just licensed
up to seasoned recreational. Those who want bus-like
stability
may find the wing too active. And those who really crave that
sports car feel may want more zip. For all the pilots in
between
those extremes, the Dragon2 offers a good “price-quality-performance
ratio”. Windmaster Paragliding offers the wing from R17,000
to
R22,000 depending on the size.
TECHSPECS
The Dragon2 is available in sizes from S to XL, which cover weight
ranges from 60 to 135 kilograms (all up). All four sizes have
the
same aspect ratio and DHV rating. This review was done on a
large, flying between 108-110 kg all up. |
|
|
|
Technical
specs : INDEPENDENCE DRAGON2 (2004)
Rating : DHV1-2
| Flat area (m2) |
|
30.7 |
| Projected area (m2) |
|
26.0 |
| Aspect ratio |
|
5.5 |
| Wing weight (kg) |
|
6.9 |
| Length of lines (m) |
|
8.5 |
| Manufacturer's speed : trim / max |
|
35 / 49 |
| Weight range (kg all up) |
|
95-120 |
| Reviewed at (kg) |
|
109 |
|
More information
Try the INDEPENDENCE website
For a test flight in South Africa
get hold of Roland at Windmaster Paragliding
Para2000
for more detailed specs.
|

|
 |
|